it occurred to me only just now that my previous comment might've come across very differently from how i intended it. if it did, i apologize. i really am annoyed at the FCC, but i shouldn't have written the comment as i did, and i've deleted it.
lol -- I took no offense at all! I was about to respond and say, "Yes, I hear that Australia is lovely this time of year."
Also, I have the serious/paranoid/probably valid question -- while all of this hubbub is going on about JJ's boob -- what are we missing? What is the news NOT reporting? What's going on just outside of our visual field while we're being distracted by this petty matter? I'm keeping my eyes peeled.
oh how cynical, and how probably very sound! that IS a scary thought. yes, it's idiotic of the media to jump on this like it's a huge thing, while we ignore real news.
thanks for understanding my comment. i was suddenly terrified that i'd maybe given a wrong impression. when the subpersonality that gets angry lets herself vent, the rest of me goes into spazzed-out-bunny mode. :D
I've only seen the pictures of her right breast, but it was...sort...of...saggy, eh?
I think it is just some sort of crass publicity-generating ploy for her upcoming album release...but does that family need any more publicity? Good, bad or otherwise?
Heehehee...cute. Personally, I think it was a scheme Janet and MJ thought up. Think about it: MJ had an arraignment last week. Janet was there. He's desperate to get the hungry media off his back. He has a chance to talk with her, she feels pity, and oops the fabric cover for the right breast comes off at the end of the show.
no subject
Date: 2004-02-03 07:11 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-02-03 07:44 am (UTC)Re:
Date: 2004-02-03 07:51 am (UTC)Also, I have the serious/paranoid/probably valid question -- while all of this hubbub is going on about JJ's boob -- what are we missing? What is the news NOT reporting? What's going on just outside of our visual field while we're being distracted by this petty matter? I'm keeping my eyes peeled.
Re:
Date: 2004-02-03 08:11 am (UTC)thanks for understanding my comment. i was suddenly terrified that i'd maybe given a wrong impression. when the subpersonality that gets angry lets herself vent, the rest of me goes into spazzed-out-bunny mode. :D
Re:
Date: 2004-02-03 08:18 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-02-03 07:55 am (UTC)I think it is just some sort of crass publicity-generating ploy for her upcoming album release...but does that family need any more publicity? Good, bad or otherwise?
Me thinks not.
Just my .02 ;)
Hope you are keeping warm in NYC :)
no subject
Date: 2004-02-03 08:04 am (UTC)Re:
Date: 2004-02-03 08:05 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-02-03 08:36 am (UTC)but seriously, don't quit your day job! :P
my co-worker and i think it's retribution for cbs for not airing the moveon.org commercial.
no subject
Date: 2004-02-03 03:39 pm (UTC)Personally, I think it was a scheme Janet and MJ thought up. Think about it: MJ had an arraignment last week. Janet was there. He's desperate to get the hungry media off his back. He has a chance to talk with her, she feels pity, and oops the fabric cover for the right breast comes off at the end of the show.
Just a thought.