sun_set_bravely: (kali)
[personal profile] sun_set_bravely
You know what I hate? You know what fills me with firebrand rage?

Filmmakers -- usually male, simply because so damn many movies in the world are made by men, but surely some women filmmakers, too -- who portray violence against women in their movies with a certain relish.

You have seen this before, even if you didn't notice it.

It's almost imperceptible, and the violence is often portrayed in order to say, "See how *awful* men can be? See what terrible things men do?" (Like we didn't already know that. Like every single woman on this planet isn't aware that things like rape, domestic violence, sex slavery exist and could, under certain circumstances, be inflicted on her own body.)

For example, I'm 15 minutes into Luc Besson's The Messenger: The Story of Joan of Arc. Not a classic or even good film, but one from a well-known filmmaker. Right off the bat, the English invade a French village. A British soldier captures Joan's sister, tears off her clothes, kills her, then rapes her. The audience is, presumably, supposed to be appalled at this horrible man's actions.

But did you notice? The thoroughness with which the director paints this scene. We see the soldiers, leering, close off every route of escape. We see all of their faces as the ringleader grabs the woman. Now, we know what's going to happen. Audiences are not stupid. The indicators of rape and torture are clear.

But this scene is not over. As the solider tears at her clothes, there are quick but definite shots of the woman's bare cleavage, her long neck, her naked thigh interspersed in this supposedly appalling moment.

Why?

For fuck's sake, WHY?

Why does a rape scene need to show such titillating parts of a woman's body? There could have been no doubt what was happening.

It's because the filmmakers have not checked their own misogyny at the door. They throw these images up on the screen without seeing how their own unresolved power issues thread through every female character's line and action.

I have this problem with Joss Whedon, often. In service of his desire to show women kicking ass, he frequently places them into awful, misogynist, violent situations. They usually fight their way out and triumph, but still -- we the viewers have to watch and take in the visual impact of men beating the shit out of women. It's why I stopped watching Dollhouse even before it was canceled. I haven't got the stomach to watch a man hunt a woman for prey anymore.

I understand that this drawn-out portrayal of violence often makes "good" storytelling by setting up just how bad it is before the situation turns.

But my tolerance for watching women get kicked around, blown up, pawed at, and on and on JUST FOR A PLOT POINT diminishes every time I watch another movie.

I can no longer collude with the habit of violence as entertainment.

Date: 2010-01-24 04:40 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] tsarina.livejournal.com
That episode of Dollhouse creeped me out in ways I couldn't quite articulate.

Date: 2010-01-24 09:49 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] http://users.livejournal.com/_lj_sucks_/
kills her, then rapes her

Wait, he kills her and then rapes her?

I'm guessing that this is part of the extra 10 minutes of footage added back when the movie was re-released. I saw the original US version, and don't remember a murder-rape scene, and the reviews I can find from 1999 mention a rape scene with a victim who is (and remains) alive. Which isn't much better, granted, but...

Date: 2010-01-24 10:06 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sun-set-bravely.livejournal.com
Oh yes indeed, he runs her through with a sword, then we see him rape her. That might be the result of extra footage; I watched it via Netflix View Instantly. Still, one must ask - why did they shoot that in the first place?

Date: 2010-01-24 10:04 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] http://users.livejournal.com/_lj_sucks_/
Also, on the subject of well-reviewed films...

Ebert rated "The Cell" as one of his best movies of 2000. Yes, it was a serial killer movie with S&M imagery, and I knew that going in. I wouldn't have minded that. However, none of the reviews--save one that I didn't see beforehand--seemed to pick up on the sheer misogyny of it. At the end, it basically turns into a very arty piece of torture porn, with the audience being asked to feel sorry for the perpetrator. I only watched it for the CGI, and it wasn't worth it.

Date: 2010-01-25 03:50 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] robertainnc.livejournal.com
well said. thanks for writing and sharing this.

Profile

sun_set_bravely: (Default)
sun_set_bravely

June 2016

S M T W T F S
   1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
26 27282930  

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Sep. 21st, 2017 10:52 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios